Fillers vs. Facelifts: Where Are the Boundaries?

Injectables are becoming more and more popular for facial rejuvenation, but there is a limit to what these agents can accomplish. Depending on the patient’s age and the type and severity of their wrinkles and folds, a facelift may be a better alternative.

fillers vs facelifts where are the boundaries 5f7c419eedb1d
Figure 1. Loose skin and jowl formation
before (left) and after facelift (right).

What types of injectables are used for facial rejuvenation?

There are two categories of injectables. Botox and Dysport, for example, are neurotoxins that relax overactive facial muscles that produce crow’s feet and brow furrows. Meanwhile, fillers such as Restylane, Juvederm and Perlane address surface depressions. These include laugh lines, also known as nasolabial folds, and marionette lines, which are the folds that deepen between the corners of the mouth down to the jaw line.

Fillers are also used to fill in hollow temples and to augment thin cheeks. However, fillers are not very effective for finely etched-in lines, such as those commonly seen above the upper lip in older women. When used appropriately, both types of injectables can help stave off the need for facial surgery or enhance the results of surgery. Fillers are most effective in individuals who are younger than fifty and who do not have sufficient looseness of the cheeks and neck to warrant a facelift. However, in older patients with significant jowl formation and loose neck skin with vertical bands, surgery such as a facelift is a more effective and long-lasting treatment (Figure 1).

What are the limitations of injectables?

Misguided efforts to avoid surgery by overusing fillers can result in an unnatural appearance. The concept of adding enough volume to take up loose skin, instead of surgically tightening it, is popular today among non-surgeons. Unfortunately, it is a mistaken notion that fillers can effectively address tissue laxity and produce a result similar to surgery. Patients compound this problem out of a natural instinct to avoid surgery if at all possible. Misuse of fillers can result in bloated cheeks that lack normal definition, impaired facial expression due to tissue stiffness, and unaesthetic, distorted facial proportions.

For those who believe that injectables are a cheaper alternative to a facelift, fillers can actually become a cumulatively more expensive option than surgery. Fillers require ongoing maintenance with risks of bruising and infection each time. Permanent fillers can avoid some of this disadvantage, but permanent fillers that are not perfectly placed can result in permanent aesthetic problems too.

fillers vs facelifts where are the boundaries 5f7c419f2081b
Figure 2. Before treatment (left), after facelift surgery to tighten
loose cheeks (center), and after fillers to restore cheek volume
(right).

What is the role of surgery in facial rejuvenation?

The role of surgery is to restore sagging tissue to a more youthful position. Facelifts tighten lower cheeks and remove jowls. The elevated tissues also fill in cheek hollows to some degree. Facelifts can also tighten loose neck skin and eliminate vertical bands, something that no filler or Botox injection can accomplish. Older individuals who have lost facial fat volume with aging can have volume restored with surgery using fat grafts taken from another part of the body.

Like fillers, surgery also has boundaries. Over-tightening is not the solution for lost tissue volume. Instead, fillers and fat grafts are required to restore a youthful fullness and smooth contours. The best advice is to have both a dermatologist and plastic surgeon involved in the long term management of facial aging (Figure 2). Each operates within the boundaries that their tools allow and have a different perspective, and the best results are achieved when there is thoughtful, close collaboration between the two.

Contact Us

Hours: 9am - 5pm

Monday - Friday

These two patients are typical of long term results with saline implants.  Saline and silicone look the same but feel different. The potential for visible ripples is the most common criticism of saline implants but this is a rare occurrence in young patients who typically have tight skin.  As stated, these devices are not for everyone but those who are candidates benefit from their durability and reduced potential for long term shape change commonly seen with silicone.

#breast #implant #saline #silicone

...

363 2
If you went to the best training program that had the biggest stars in every area back in the day (NYU), you learned how to be good at everything.  Super sub-specializing constricts the overall development of your aesthetic sense. Also, like cross-training, using different “muscles”enhances your overall performance.  Finally, one only has to look at Michelangelo, the best painter and sculptor ever, to be convinced it’s not only possible to be good at more than one thing but to be able to excel in multiple areas. 

#art #plasticsurgery #excellence

...

1049 14
There are many variables in breast augmentation: implant volume, shape, manufacturer, and filler substance; incision location; over or under the muscle; patient specific anatomy; and both the surgeon’s and patient’s aesthetic sense. Achieving the best result takes all of these factors into account and, as shown here, there is often more than one way to do it.  Remember, it’s not one and done.  Implants require periodic replacement life long. Fat grafts, as an alternative, do not work. 
#implant #anatomy #muscle

...

1411 26
Patient’s often ask, which method is better, SMAS or deep plane?  If there was a clear superiority, all surgeons would be using the same technique. Put another way, as our nurse Meghan says, “it’s not the racquet, it’s the player”. True here too. 

SMAS is an acronym for  a medical term: Superficial MusculoAponeurotic System. Structurally it is a sheet of fibrous and fatty tissue that can be tightened to recreate a more youthful facial shape. 

#face #lift #young

...

1680 17
Scroll to Top